Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Previous assessments of nominal exchange rate determination, following Meese and Rogoff (1983) have focused upon a narrow set of models. Cheung et al. (2005) augmented the usual suspects with productivity based models, and “behavioral equilibrium exchange rate” models, and assessed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012963129
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011641004
Previous assessments of nominal exchange rate determination, following Meese and Rogoff (1983) have focused upon a narrow set of models. Cheung et al. (2005) augmented the usual suspects with productivity based models, and "behavioral equilibrium exchange rate" models, and assessed performance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011637474
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012039052
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012228200
Previous assessments of nominal exchange rate determination, following Meese and Rogoff (1983) have focused upon a narrow set of models. Cheung et al. (2005) augmented the usual suspects with productivity based models, and "behavioral equilibrium exchange rate" models, and assessed performance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012960174
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010232620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012139586
This paper evaluates monetary policy effects in a fixed exchange rate regime. A fixed exchange rate regime sometimes suffers from turbulence, owing to speculative attacks or other factors that significantly change the expectations of maintaining such a regime. We, therefore, develop a vector...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012846617
Recent evidence has shown that the dollar depreciates instead of appreciates in response to a tightening of U.S. monetary policy. This phenomenon generates a U.S. exchange rate puzzle. Following Jarocinski and Karadi (2020), we divide the U.S. monetary surprises into pure monetary policy and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013404740