Showing 1 - 10 of 11
This study tests whether naïve trading by individual investors, or some class of individual investors, causes post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD). Inconsistent with the individual trading hypothesis, individual investor trading fails to subsume any of the power of extreme earnings surprises...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012913220
Prior studies use fundamental earnings forecasts to proxy for the market's expectations of earnings because analyst forecasts are biased and are available for only a subset of firms. We find that as a proxy for market expectations, fundamental forecasts contain systematic measurement errors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012904816
We test whether firms that exclude the effects of amortization from their non-GAAP earnings allocate more of an acquisition’s purchase price to definite-lived intangible assets (DLIA). This strategy can yield two potential benefits: it can (1) increase non-GAAP earnings by shifting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014362328
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014390391
We test whether agency conflicts generated by the divergence between insider voting rights and cash flow rights (i.e., disproportionate insider control) within dual-class firms reduce the informativeness of stock returns about future earnings. We find that the future earnings response...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013229808
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009427888
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008935181
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003806480
Prior studies use fundamental earnings forecasts to proxy for the market's expectations of earnings because analyst forecasts are biased and are available for only a subset of firms. We find that as a proxy for market expectations, fundamental forecasts contain systematic measurement errors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012858747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013252475