Showing 1 - 10 of 22
This study provides a rigorous empirical comparison of structural and reduced-formcredit risk frameworks. As major difference we focus on the discriminative modelingof the default time. In contrast to the previous literature, we calibrate both approaches to the same data set, apply comparable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008911532
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003710806
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001607478
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010245592
We document that cost stickiness is priced in the CDS market. More specifically, we show that creditors require higher risk premiums for sticky firms consistent with stickiness increasing asset volatility. In addition, we find that creditors require lower or no risk premiums if stickiness is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012855448
This study provides a rigorous empirical comparison of structural and reduced-form credit risk frameworks. As major difference we focus on the discriminative modeling of default time. In contrast to previous literature, we calibrate both approaches to bond and equity prices. By using same input...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009010090
The finance literature looks at a number of factors to explain risk premia in corporate debt, such as liquidity effects, jump-to-default risk, and contagion risk. Stochastic re-covery rates as a source of systematic risk have not received much attention so far, most likely due to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013134668
We develop a new methodology to extract market expectations of recovery rates that uses information from credit default swap spreads on debt instruments of different seniorities, incorporates information on the firm-specific liability structure and allows for deviations from the absolute...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013061211
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003757569
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003859326