Showing 1 - 10 of 85
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012122586
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003963200
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009419661
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009628549
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008810561
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003765523
It is usually believed that higher competition, implying more active firms, benefits consumers and encourages the antitrust authorities to foster competition. We show that this view can be misleading, and higher competition may actually make the consumers worse-off. We suggest that the antitrust...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008764304
It is generally believed that higher competition benefits consumers, and encourage the antitrust authorities to foster competition. We show that this view can be misleading in the presence of welfare-maximising nationalised firms. Using a simple model with a nationalised firm, we show that entry...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008764305
Considering a move from monopoly to duopoly, Bastos et al. (“Open shop unions and product market competition”, 2010, Canadian Journal of Economics) provides open-shop union, where the union density is less than one, as a theoretical reason for the evidence of a positive relationship between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008764312
We show that if the product market is not very much concentrated, open shop union, where the union density is less than one, may not be a justification for a positive relationship between product market competition and unionized wage, irrespective of the union density, bargaining power of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863118