Another significant change is currently occurring in the Indian educational system. Higher education institutions are increasingly seeking national and international accreditation. The accreditation process enables students and various other stakeholders to be informed of choices regarding universities, as well as aiding educational institutions in obtaining enhanced academic quality through benchmarking. Most colleges are still in the planning stages; however, some schools are already accredited, and others are in the process. This essay provided a thorough comparison of some of the most reputable worldwide certification organizations, including AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) in the United States, AMBA (Association of MBAs) in the United Kingdom, and others. The primary Indian accreditation organizations are NBA (National Board of Accreditation) and NAAC (National Assessment Accreditation Council), as well as EQUIS (EFMD Quality Improvement System) - EU and IACBE - USA. This comparison can be used to quickly assess how different management accreditation boards differ in terms of eligibility, duration of accreditation, requirements, and other factors. The National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) was founded in 1994 and is an independent organization within the University Grants Commission (UGC) of India. It has been given the duty of evaluating and accrediting Indian colleges and universities to advance the standard of instruction, learning, and research. As part of this mission, NAAC has been working to redesign its current assessment and accreditation methodologies based on its own field experience, knowledge shared with other international quality assurance agencies, and the quality requirements in the evolving global higher education landscape. As stated in its vision statement, NAAC's mission is to make quality assurance an essential component of how higher education institutions (HEIs) operate. The NAAC's accreditation structure is built around five basic values: (i) promoting national development; (ii) fostering global competencies among students; (iii) instilling a value system among students; (iv) promoting the use of technology; and (v) pursuing excellence. The evaluation of institutions that volunteer to be accredited by NAAC is based on these five basic values. The seven criteria established by NAAC are (1) Curricular Aspects; (2) Teaching-Learning and Evaluation; (3) Research, Consultancy, and Extension; (4) Infrastructure and Learning Resources; (5) Student Support and Progression; and (6) Governance, Leadership, and Management. (7) New Innovations/developments and best practices. Using our recently created analyzing framework for business models, operational ideas, and functional systems called the ABCD approach, we have examined NAAC Accreditation Criteria in this study. Focus groups were used to identify each factor's constituent important parts as well as the many factors affecting these. The outcomes validated the application of the ABCD analyzing technique to a system performance assessment. This study analyses the research base resource, how to promote educational journals at the international standards with other statutory publications, and various technical assistance for peer review publications for higher educational growth and creative advancement
