Learning-By-Doing Vs. On-the-Job Training : Using Variation Induced by the EITC to Distinguish Between Models of Skill Formation
James Heckman, Lance Lochner, Ricardo Cossa
This paper investigates the impact of wage subsidies on skill formulation. We analyze two prototypical models of skill formation: (a) a learning-by-doing model and (b) an on-the-job training model. We develop conditions on the pricing of jobs under which the two models are equivalent. In general they are different and have different implications of wage subsidies on skill formation. On-the-job training models predict that wage subsidies reduce skill formation. Learning-by-doing models predict the opposite. The provisional evidence favors the learning-by-doing model. We apply our estimates to investigate the impact of the EITC on skill formation. We estimate that the EITC reduced the long term wages of participants with low levels of education
Year of publication: |
July 2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Heckman, James |
Other Persons: | Lochner, Lance (contributor) ; Cossa, Ricardo (contributor) |
Institutions: | National Bureau of Economic Research (contributor) |
Publisher: |
Cambridge, Mass : National Bureau of Economic Research |
Subject: | Betriebliches Bildungsmanagement | Employer-provided training | Qualifikation | Occupational qualification | Lohnsubvention | Wage subsidy |
Saved in:
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource |
---|---|
Series: | NBER working paper series ; no. w9083 |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Mode of access: World Wide Web System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers. |
Other identifiers: | 10.3386/w9083 [DOI] |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012469630