Learning to de-escalate: The effects of regret in escalation of commitment
The current research investigates whether and how individuals are able to learn from one escalation situation to another, hypothesizing that post-escalation regret will reduce subsequent escalation. In Experiment 1, individuals participated in an escalation task after escalating their commitments in a first escalation situation. In Experiment 2, participants' regret was manipulated by asking them to imagine engaging in an escalation situation. The experiments expand our theoretical and practical understanding of how to prevent escalation of commitment by demonstrating that escalation-specific regret--either experienced from an earlier escalation or primed through imagining an escalation scenario--reduced subsequent escalation in a different context. The discussion focuses on the theoretical and practical impact of regret and emotions in general in escalation of commitment.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ku, Gillian |
Published in: |
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. - Elsevier, ISSN 0749-5978. - Vol. 105.2008, 2, p. 221-232
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The promise and peril of self-affirmation in de-escalation of commitment
Sivanathan, Niro, (2008)
-
Zhong, Chen-Bo, (2010)
-
Ku, Gillian, (2005)
- More ...