Reference Wealth Effects in Sequential Choice.
It is argued that in order to accommodate experimentally-observed choice patterns, it is not enough to model the utility function as being dependent on changes from a reference wealth point. Instead, individuals should be modeled as treating decisions as part of an identifiable sequence of decisions, and utility should be a function of reference wealth, income so far from the sequence, and payoffs from the current decision. The three-argument utility function allows for risk aversion over gains and risk seeking over losses for the first choice in the sequence, and for the house money and break-even effects in later decisions. Copyright 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | Neilson, William S |
Published in: |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. - Springer. - Vol. 17.1998, 1, p. 27-47
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Comparative Risk Sensitivity with Reference-Dependent Preferences.
Neilson, William S, (2002)
-
The 1985-86 Oil Price Collapse and Afterwards: What Does Game Theory Add?
Griffin, James M, (1994)
-
A Further Examination of Cumulative Prospect Theory Parameterizations.
Neilson, William S, (2002)
- More ...