- 0. Executive summary
- 1. Introduction
- 1.1 Purpose of the study
- 1.2 Methodology
- 1.3 Policy background
- ...
- 2. Past experiences of relocation of beneficiaries of international protection
- ...
- 3. Problem definition and possible solutions
- 3.1 The main challenges
- 3.2 Responding to the challenges
- 3.3 Summary
- 4. The options
- 4.1 Option I „Relocation according to a pre-determined quota‟
- 4.2 Option II: „Relocation and burden-sharing on an ad hoc basis‟
- 4.3 The impact of the quota in Option 1
- 5. Political implications
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 Relocation for whom?
- 5.3 How many places for relocation, and where?
- 5.4 Would relocation be a pull factor?
- 5.5 Role of the Commission and of the European Asylum Support Office
- 5.6 The position of the 26 Member States concerning the two options
- ...
- 5.7 Summing up on the political implications
- 5.8 Concluding on the feasibility of the two Options (political implications)
- 6. Legal implications
- 6.1 National legal implications
- 6.2 Legal implications with respect to the current EU legal framework
- ...
- 6.3 Summing up on legal implications
- 6.4 Concluding on the feasibility of the two Options (legal implications)
- 7. Financial implications
- 7.1 Costs of relocation
- ...
- 7.2 The Options
- ...
- 7.3 Summing up on financial feasibility
- 7.4 Concluding on the feasibility of the two Options (financial implications)
- 8. Comparison between options
- 9. Alternatives to relocation
- 10. Conclusions
- SUPPLEMENTS
- Annex
- Annex A: List of Interviewees
- Annex B: References
- Annex C: Simulation data
- Annex D: Financial Data
- Annex E: Interview guides
- Annex F: Literature review
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010533547