Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Apologies : Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment
We use a theory of apologies to design a nationwide field experiment involving 1.5 million Uber ridesharing consumers who experienced late rides. Several insights emerge from our field experiment. First, apologies are not a panacea: the efficacy of an apology and whether it may backfire depend on how the apology is made. Second, across treatments, money speaks louder than words – the best form of apology is to include a coupon for a future trip. Third, in some cases sending an apology is worse than sending nothing at all, particularly for repeated apologies. For firms, caveat venditor should be the rule when considering apologies.Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at "http://www.nber.org/papers/w25676"
Year of publication: |
2019
|
---|---|
Authors: | Halperin, Basil |
Other Persons: | Ho, Benjamin (contributor) ; List, John A. (contributor) ; Muir, Ian (contributor) |
Publisher: |
[2019]: [S.l.] : SSRN |
Subject: | Uber <Firma> | Share Economy | Sharing economy | Experiment | Dienstleistungsqualität | Service quality | Beschwerdemanagement | Complaint management | Kundenservice | Customer service | Personenverkehr | Passenger transport | USA | United States |
Saved in:
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource (39 p) |
---|---|
Series: | NBER Working Paper ; No. w25676 |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments March 2019 erstellt |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012889706