Showing 1 - 10 of 110
contests with heterogeneous agents who may individually sabotage each other. Our results suggest that sabotaging behavior … revealed sabotage decreases while retaliation motives prevail. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263109
We analyze a two-stage game between two heterogeneous players.At stage one, common risk is chosen by one of the players. At stagetwo, both players observe the given level of risk and simultaneouslyinvest in a winner-take-all competition. The game is solved theoreticallyand then tested by using...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009354148
We show that a team may favor self-sabotage to influence the principal’s contract decision. Sabotage increases a team …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041830
contests with heterogeneous agents who may individually sabotage each other. Our results suggest that sabotaging behavior … revealed sabotage decreases while retaliation motives prevail. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004989635
This paper discusses the strategic role of mismatching, where players voluntarily form inefficient teams or forego the formation of efficient teams, respectively. Strategic mismatching can be rational when players realize a competitive advantage (e.g. harming other competitors). In addition, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262295
Splitting leagues or tournaments seems to be puzzling when agents are homogeneous and splitting leads to a negative competition effect. However, it can be shown that the principal can nevertheless benefit from splitting. First, splitting can be used as a divide-and-rule strategy by the principal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263059
Rank-order tournaments are usually modeled simultaneously. However, real tournaments are often sequential. We show that agents’ strategic behavior in sequential-move tournaments significantly differ from the one in simultaneous-move tournaments: In a sequential-move tournament with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263117
We analyze a two-stage game between two heterogeneous players. At stage one, common risk is chosen by one of the players. At stage two, both players observe the given level of risk and simultaneously invest in a winner-take-all competition The game is solved theoretically and then tested by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264918
Individuals who compete in a contest-like situation (for example, in sports, in promotion tournaments, or in an appointment contest) may have an incentive to illegally utilize resources in order to improve their relative positions. We analyze such doping or cheating within a tournament game...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010267284
We show that in competitive careers based on individual performance the least productive individuals may have the highest probabilities to be promoted to top positions. These individuals have the lowest fall-back positions and, hence, the highest incentives to succeed in career contests. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010270016