Evaluation Twinning versus Technical Assistance : Final report

The focus of the evaluation is on the comparison of the delivery instruments twinning (standard and light) and technical assistance under IPA 2007-2008, Phare 2005-2006, CARDS 2005-2006 and the Turkey pre-accession assistance instrument 2005-2006 in the candidate and potential candidates.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2011-01-26
Authors:	Nugteren, Mart ; Willemsen, Anja ; Burisch, Michael
Institutions:	Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung (contributor) ; ECORYS-NEI, Rotterdam (contributor)
Subject:	Bewertung \| evaluation \| Entwicklungsförderung \| promotion of development \| EU \| EU-Beitritt \| joining of the European Union \| Finanzhilfe \| financial assistance \| Nachbarschaftshilfe \| neighborhood help \| Südosteuropa \| Southeastern Europe \| technische Hilfe \| technical assistance \| Türkei \| Turkey

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

List of Abbreviations
Preface
Executive summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives of the Evaluation
1.2 Methodology
...
1.3 Brief description of the Evaluation Process
1.4 The scope
2 The selection process - Is the selection done appropriately?
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Is the selection of twinning and TA supported by adequate (cost-benefit) analysis?
...
2.3 Are beneficiaries properly situated to make an appropriate and independent selection?
2.4 Are assessments realistic and reflect actual implementation practice?
2.5 Are the non-tangible benefits of twinning adequately identified and assessed?
2.6 Share of twinning over the years and between (potential) candidates
2.7 How efficient is the selection process?
...
2.8 Conclusions
3 Does the selected instrument enable an effective and efficient project implementation and sustainability?
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Findings of the Cost-Benefit Assessment
...
3.3 In which areas are twinning and TA most effective as instrument?
...
3.4 To what extent do control mechanisms for twinning and TA contracts impact their efficiency and effectiveness?
3.5 Which are the factors having an impact on effectiveness and sustainability of assistance?
3.6 Are there examples of projects combining TA and twinning?
3.7 Are different beneficiaries using different instruments to achieve the same objective? Which lessons can be learned?
...
3.8 Conclusions
...
4 How can the selection process be improved?
4.1 Main conclusions
4.2 Recommendations
...
Annex 1 Terms of Reference
Annex 2 The Evaluation Framework
Annex 3 Results of the mapping exercise
Annex 4 Blueprint for Selection of Instrument
Annex 5 List of Literature and Documents consulted

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476707