- Executive summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Methodology
- 3. Policy back ground and Problem definition
- 3.1 Setting the scene
- 3.1.1 EU political developments and debates: from extra-territorial to intra-territorial processing
- 3.1.2 ...
- 3.2 Addressing the fundamental questions
- 3.2.1 What is joint processing?
- 3.2.2 ...
- 3.3 Summary
- 4. Presentation of the options
- 4.1 The overall objective of establishing an EU mechanism for joint processing
- 4.2 Introducing the proposed options
- 4.3 The proposed options
- 5. Political implications
- 5.1 The political implications of joint processing as a principle, or a concept
- 5.2 The most feasible and/or preferred option
- 5.3 Political implications of Option A
- 5.4 Political implications of Option B
- 5.5 Political implications of Option C
- 5.6 Political implications of Option D
- 5.7 Conclusions on the political implications
- 6. Legal and practical implications
- 6.1 National legal and practical implications of joint processing
- 6.2 EU legal and practical implications of supported processing
- 6.2.1 Option A
- 6.2.2 ...
- 6.3 Legal implications of joint processing
- 6.3.1 General legal considerations for Option D
- 6.4 Specific legal considerations for Option D
- 7. Financial implications
- 7.1 Costs of processing asylum claims
- 7.1.1 Constraints and caveats
- 7.1.2 ...
- 7.2 The options
- 7.2.1 Costs and benefits of joint processing: assessments for Option D
- 7.2.2 ...
- 7.3 Conclusions on financial implications
- 8. Conclusions and recommendations
- 8.1 Comparison of options
- 8.2 Revision of the options
- 8.3 Revisiting the definition of joint processing
- 8.4 Next steps8.4.1Joint Processing piloted in an ‘isolated’ context
- References
- ANNEX A
- LIST OF INTERVIEWEES
- ANNEX B
- INTERVIEW GUIDE
- ANNEX C
- FINANCIAL QUESTIONNAIRE
- ANNEX D
- FINANCIAL DATA FROM THE MEMBER STATES
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011624941