Study on the application of Council Regulation (EC) N° 1206/2001, on cooperation between the courts of the member states in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matter
| Alternative title: | Studie zur Anwendung der Verordnung (EC) Nr. 1206/2001 über die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Gerichten der Mitgliedstaaten bei der Beweisaufnahme in Zivil- und Handelssachen Our Reference: FINAL_REPORT_1206_A_09032007 |
|---|---|
| Year of publication: |
2007-03-01
|
| Institutions: | mainstrat |
| Publisher: |
Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
| Subject: | Gericht | court | Handelsrecht | Commercial Law | Zivilrecht | civil law |
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- 2 FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY
- 2.1 CONTEXTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY. THE 1206/2001 REGULATION
- 2.1.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
- 2.1.1.1 Binding all the Member States
- 2.1.2 THE CREATION OF AN AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE IN THE EU
- 2.2 THE CONTENT OF THE REGULATION
- 2.2.1 ADOPTION OF REGULATION 1206/2001 (“the Regulation”)
- 2.2.1.1 Relationship of Regulation 1206 with the European Judicial Network
- 2.2.1.2 Transitional measures and relationship with other regulatory instruments
- 2.2.2 SCOPE OF THE REGULATION
- 2.2.2.1 Introduction
- 2.2.2.2 Territorial scope
- 2.2.3 BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE METHODS FOR TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN THE REGULATION
- 2.2.4 PURPOSE OF THE REGULATION. AN EX-ANTE EVALUATION
- 2.3 OUR TASK IN CURRENT STUDY
- 3 STUDY METHODOLOGY
- 3.1 METHODOLOGY
- 3.1.1 Objectives
- 3.1.2 Approach taken
- 3.1.2.1 Groups of Professionals
- 3.1.3 The Results
- 3.1.3.1 Targets for the Survey
- 3.1.3.2 Information-gathering procedure
- 3.2 THE TEAM FOR THE CURRENT STUDY
- 4 STUDY FINDINGS
- 4.1.1 Objectives of Regulation 1206/2001
- 4.1.2 Speed of obtaining evidence
- 4.1.3 Central bodies referred to in Article 3.1
- 4.1.3.1 Effectiveness of the central bodies
- 4.1.3.2 Participation of the central bodies
- 4.1.4 Competent authorities referred to in Article 3(3)
- 4.1.4.1 Conclusions
- 4.1.4.2 Proposals
- 4.1.5 The request: simplicity, clarity and legal certainty
- 4.1.6 Communications technology
- 4.1.6.1 Means of communication
- 4.1.6.2 The impact of communications technology
- 4.1.6.3 Use of the “swiftest possible means”
- 4.1.7 The economic cost of assistance
- 4.1.7.1 Conclusions
- 4.1.7.2 Proposals
- 4.1.8 Courts referred to in Article 2(2)
- 4.1.8.1 Conclusions
- 4.1.8.2 Proposals
- 4.1.9 The direct transmission system
- 4.1.9.1 The system of direct transmission between judges
- 4.1.9.2 Receipt of the request
- 4.1.9.3 Autonomous procedural law
- 4.1.9.4
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009639899