Comparative Study on Best Practices in the Field of Forced Return Monitoring : Final report ; JLS/2009/RFXX/CA/1001
| Year of publication: |
2011-11-10
|
|---|---|
| Institutions: | Matrix insight ; International Centre for Migration Policy Development, Wien |
| Publisher: |
Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
| Subject: | Abschiebung | deportation | Best Practice | best practice | EU | Überwachung | monitoring |
- Executive Summary
- 1.0 Introduction
- 2.0 Methodology
- 2.1 Client Meetings and Key Deliverables<br<2.2 Stakeholder Consultations
- 2.3 Desk Research
- 2.4 Comparative Country Overview: Survey
- 2.5 Best Practice: Case Studies
- 3.0 Conceptual Framework
- 3.1 Basic Classification of Irregular Migrants
- 3.2 Voluntary and Forced Return
- 3.3 Features of a Standard Forced Returns Monitoring System
- 4.0 Comparative Country Overview
- 4.1 Overview of Voluntary and Forced Returns
- 4.2 Forced Returns Monitoring Systems
- 4.3 Organisations in Charge of Monitoring Forced Return
- 4.4 Scope of the Monitoring System
- 4.5 Tasks & Competencies of the Monitors
- 5.0 An Inventory of Best Practices
- 5.1 Organisations Involved in Monitoring Forced Returns
- 5.2 Scope of Monitoring System
- 5.3 Tasks and Competencies of Monitors
- 5.4 Frontex Flights
- 6.0 Conclusions & Recommendations (Checklist)
- APPENDICES
- Appendix A: Detailed Situation Across Member States
- Appendix B: Bibliography
- Appendix C: Survey Questionnaire
- Appendix D: Country Profiles
- Austria
- ...
- Iceland
- ...
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom
- Appendix E: Interview Question Catalogue
- Appendix F: Case Studies
- Austria
- Belgium
- France
- Germany
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
- Norway
- Poland
- Switzerland<br<Appendix G: Contact Log
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010528097