- Glossary of Acronyms
- Preface
- Executive Summary
- Rezumat
- Main report
- 1. Introduction
- 1.1 Objectives
- 1.2 Background and context
- 1.3 Evaluation Questions
- 2. Performance of PHARE Assistance
- 2.1 Overall, Phare could only achieve mixed performance
- 2.2 Assistance was not strategically based until recently
- 2.3 Assistance was disbursed with pervasive delays
- 2.4 Phare sectoral institution building for the acquis generally performed well
- 2.5 Positive immediate and some intermediate impact, but limited wider impact
- 2.6 Pre-conditions for sustainability are building up
- 3. Thematic/crosscutting findings
- 3.1 Romania's pre-accession process was heaviliy dependent on Phare assistance
- 3.2 Phare's achievements underminded by slow progress on horizontal administrative and judicial capacity
- 3.3 National preparations for STructural Funds have recently accelerated with encouraging results
- 4. Conclusions, lessons learned and recommendations
- 4.1 Conclusions
- 4.2 Lessons learned
- 4.3 Recommendations
- Annexes
- Annex 1 Terms of reference
- Annex 2 Phare National and CBC Programmes Data for Romania 1999-2004
- Annex 3 Evaluation Planning Summmary Sheet
- Annex 4 Evaluation Indicators
- Annex 5 Sample projects 1999-2004 - Financial data and results
- Annex 6 Delays in Project implementations
- Annex 7 Case Study on RICOP
- Annex 8 List of Documents
- Annex 9 List of interviews
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476814