- Glossary of Acronyms
- Preface
- Executive Summary
- Main report
- 1. Introduction
- 1.1 Objectives
- 1.2 Background and context
- 1.3 Evaluation Questions
- 1.4 Limitations affecting the evaluation
- 2. Performance of PHARE Assistance
- 2.1 Overall performance was good
- 2.2 Programmes were relevant, but design was often weak
- 2.3 Many outputs but nor always cost-effective
- 2.4 Intended results mostly achieved
- 2.5 Signigicant contribution to wider objectives
- 2.6 Institutional reforms largely sustainable
- 3. Thematic/crosscutting findings
- 3.1 Phare improves the performance of Slovakia's process
- 3.2Successful but uneven Phare contributions to strengthened administrative and judicial capacity
- 3.3 Phare ESC institution building was useful but not cost-effective
- 4. Conclusions and lessons learned
- 4.1 Conclusions
- 4.2 Recommendations and Lessons learned
- Annexes
- Annex 1 Terms of reference
- Annex 2 Phare National and CBC Programmes Data for Slovak Republic 1999-2001
- Annex 3 Evaluation Planning Summmary Sheet
- Annex 4 Evaluation Indicators
- Annex 5 Sample projects - Financial data and key results
- Annex 6 Ex post assessment of the use of Phare for the Slovak Civil Service reform
- Annex 7 List of documents
- Annex 8 List of Interviews
- Annex 9 Respondents to Questionnaires
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476816