• Glossary of Acronyms
  • Preface
  • Executive Summary
  • Main report
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1 Objectives
  • 1.2 Background and context
  • 1.3 Evaluation Questions
  • 1.4 Limitations affecting the evaluation
  • 2. Performance of PHARE Assistance
  • 2.1 Overall performance was good
  • 2.2 Programmes were relevant, but design was often weak
  • 2.3 Many outputs but nor always cost-effective
  • 2.4 Intended results mostly achieved
  • 2.5 Signigicant contribution to wider objectives
  • 2.6 Institutional reforms largely sustainable
  • 3. Thematic/crosscutting findings
  • 3.1 Phare improves the performance of Slovakia's process
  • 3.2Successful but uneven Phare contributions to strengthened administrative and judicial capacity
  • 3.3 Phare ESC institution building was useful but not cost-effective
  • 4. Conclusions and lessons learned
  • 4.1 Conclusions
  • 4.2 Recommendations and Lessons learned
  • Annexes
  • Annex 1 Terms of reference
  • Annex 2 Phare National and CBC Programmes Data for Slovak Republic 1999-2001
  • Annex 3 Evaluation Planning Summmary Sheet
  • Annex 4 Evaluation Indicators
  • Annex 5 Sample projects - Financial data and key results
  • Annex 6 Ex post assessment of the use of Phare for the Slovak Civil Service reform
  • Annex 7 List of documents
  • Annex 8 List of Interviews
  • Annex 9 Respondents to Questionnaires