• Members of the European Network of Legal Experts in the Field of GenderEquality
  • Part I
  • Executive Summary
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1. Legal background
  • 1.2. General situation
  • 2. Harassment related to sex and sexual harassment in the context ofanti-discrimination law
  • 2.1. Legislation
  • 2.1.1. On the implementation of EU law generally
  • 2.1.2. Definitions
  • 2.1.3. Is sexual harassment related to sex discrimination?
  • 2.1.4. The addressees of implementing regulations
  • 2.1.5. Prevention
  • 2.1.6. Procedures
  • 2.1.7. Burden of proof
  • 2.1.8. Remedies and sanctions
  • 2.2. Case law
  • 2.2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2.2. National courts and equality bodies; general features of case law
  • 2.2.3. Focus on dignity
  • 3. Harassment related to sex and sexual harassment outside the framework of anti-discrimination law
  • 3.1. Legislation
  • 3.2. The role of collective agreements
  • 4. The Discriminatory Approach versus the Dignity Harm Approach – a final analysis
  • 4.1. Added value
  • 4.2. Pitfalls
  • 4.3. Concluding remarks
  • Part II
  • National Law: Reports from the Experts of the Member States, EEA Countries, Croatia, FYR of Macedonia and Turkey
  • AUSTRIA
  • BELGIUM
  • BULGARIA
  • CROATIA
  • CYPRUS
  • CZECH REPUBLIC
  • DENMARK
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FRANCE
  • GERMANY
  • GREECE
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • IRELAND
  • ITALY
  • LATVIA
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • FYR of MACEDONIA
  • MALTA
  • THE NETHERLANDS
  • NORWAY
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • ROMANIA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • SPAIN
  • SWEDEN
  • TURKEY
  • UNITED KINGOM
  • Annex 1 Questionnaire
  • Annex II Bibliography